.. and the weekend after

Come Saturday it became apparent that I am one of a national trend, hundreds of LibDem councillors not having been re-elected.  It’s something of a pity that public spirited individuals working for local communities should be ‘thrown out’ on account of national issues.  However, it’s also clear that the public feels that is about the only way it has of expressing its feelings!  The referendum on voting reform suffered, I reckon, through being held on the same day.  Things tended to be conflated in the public mind.

It’s all going to be interesting from here on.  The Coalition is beginning to read like some soap opera:  what will Nick do next?  How’s Dave going to keep the peace?  Does he want to?   What do SamCam and Miriam Clegg think of it all?   Does anyone care?

Posted in Council stuff, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

..the morning after

Last night, or rather this morning, to bed around 4 a.m. and heard the first bird – a cuckoo.  No euphoric haze of re-election because all three of the LibDem councillors standing for re-election were wiped out – as were many others across the country.  In our case, the Council now stands at 56 Conservatives and 1 Independent.  Whatever your political colour, you might agree it doesn’t sound too good for democracy.

A few nice people have contacted us this morning and we – husband and self – are taking a few days’ mini-break.  Then on with the rest of our lives:  there will be more time for writing now.

Posted in Council stuff | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Elections!

Well, it’s all been rather quiet here on the blogsite lately, what with Easter, The Wedding and now the Elections!   It has not been at all quiet out here in the shires, where we have four ballots tomorrow:  Voting Reform, Borough Council and Parish Council elections and a County Council by-election.   No wonder some people seem a little dazed by it all.

In the past three weeks I have delivered hundreds of leaflets and knocked on hundreds of doors.   Anyone who has been a dedicated deliverer of leaflets – or a postman – will tell you about grazed knuckles and broken finger nails, for the designers of domestic letter-boxes hardly seem to have tested their products.  The worst position for a letter-box is probably near ground level .  There is a surprising quantity of these.  Delivery usually necessitates lowering everything one is carrying to the ground, an undignified crouch to stuff the by now squashed piece of paper through the aperture, straighten up and gather up one’s possessions with as much dignity as possible, which is very little.  The worst type of letter-box is undoubtely the sort with a spring flap designed to snick the ends off fingers.  They can draw blood.  I had a painful encounter with one the other day which had a spring flap on each side.   More and more letter boxes have little draught-excluding brushes which must be a curse for postmen.   A thickish envelope may slide through, but something as flimsy as the average leaflet has to be carefully slid through, so the fingers pass through the aperture along with the paper.

This is where DOGS come into the picture.  Well, they always were in the picture.   Dogs do not like things that come at them unexpectedly and this includes anything appearing through the front door.  Especially hands.   All leaflet deliverers, and probably postmen too, have horror stories which go something like this:  “I could hear the dog on the inside, barking and growling and jumping at the door.  I tried to stuff the paper through as fast as I could and I felt its hot breath/whiskers/teeth or all three.   This is made worse by the draught-excluding brushes which make it difficult to withdraw the hand rapidly.  You get the picture.

Cats, though, are different.  I have met some delightful cats on my rounds this time.   Many are pleased to pass the time of day, some expect one to let them in the house if no-one is in [don’t your owners know about catflaps?] and only a few make off in the opposite direction.  Occasionally one may decide to come along for the walk, which means doubling back to ensure pussy’s safe return.  Only tonight a pair of pure white cats sat on a roof watching our small though lively band with aloof interest.

The people – yes, they are very different,  from the friendly and so-welcome ‘Yes, we’re voting for you, you can count on it’ to the door slammed in my husband’s face, ‘We’re eating!’  [Lucky you, thought I!]   Most people are polite, many are interesting, and there is endless capacity for the unexpected.  There has been a lot of laughter.

There can be some unforeseen moments.  I am not going to forget the gentleman I saw tonight who explained with the utmost kindness and courtesy that I could not possibly have known it – which was true – but his wife had passed away quite recently.  Nor will I forget one young mother who was so concerned about her son’s education.

It is Election Day tomorrow – today as I write – when our local elections may be overshadowed by the historic referendum on voting reform.    To be continued…

Posted in Council stuff | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who could envy Jamie Perks? [Philip Larkin got it right]

Who could envy Jamie Perks?   Or:  Philip Larkin* got it right

The Archers editorial team really have got it in for troubled teenager Jamie Perks.  As if they had not devised enough for this lad to handle already, the latest turn of events looks set to tip him firmly off the straight-and-narrow.

Is Ambridge working up to a full-scale Jacobean tragedy?   Consider the scenario – and please bear with me because it’s not simple [Archers fans can skip the next three or four paragraphs]:

Jamie is the only child of the marriage between widower Sid Perks, landlord of The Bull, and schoolteacher Kathie.  Jamie enjoys a normal childhood – until Sid falls for the comely charms of songstress Jolene.   [Remember the steamy scene in the shower?  I thought not.]   Kathy concludes the marriage is over and takes Jamie to live in a nearby cottage.

Jolene [a natural behind the bar] moves into The Bull with daughter Fallon. Kathy is raped in the village hall and subsequently gets together with Kenton Archer.  Kenton develops a step-dad relationship with Jamie and Jolene is the kindly step-mum.  In 2010 Sid dies in New Zealand and simmering tensions between Kathy and Kenton boil up.   Kenton has a drunken one-night stand in Borchester.  Kathy finds out and Kenton moves out.  Jamie’s feelings of abandonment and rejection go through the roof when he finds out about Kenton’s one-nighter.  He gets into some stupid stuff, drink and petty vandalism.

You are thinking plenty of kids manage to grow up through this sort of thing, but read on please.

What happens now but – wait for it, because this is where the boundaries of belief are stretched thin –  but widow Jolene and now-free Kenton take a shine to one another.   Jamie finds out accidentally and goes into shock but continues to visit step-sister Fallon at The Bull.  Kathy tries to stop this and an unpleasant scene ensues with Jolene.   Confused?

Let’s get this straight:  Jamie’s Mum’s ex-lover has got together with his step-mother.   Or, his late father’s widow is an item with his mother’s ex-partner.  It’s the same thing.  First his father and now his mother’s ex-partner have succumbed to the siren Jolene.

Any lad would be a bit upset.

*  See Philip Larkin’s poem, “This be the verse” [“They **** you up, your mum and dad” is the best-known line]: Philip Larkin, “High Windows” published by Faber, 1974.

Posted in 'The Archers' | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Where were you when they killed Nigel Pargetter? [part 2]

/continued…    dum-di-dum-di-dum…

‘They’ve killed Nigel!’ I shrieked in outrage as we disembarked.   “How could they do that!”   It was all quite unsettling and, as others have observed, a bizarre way for The Archers to celebrate the Big Anniversary   And what an opportunity lost by the editorial  team to explore the issues that arise when someone is seriously disabled in an accident!   [Which is, sadly, a strong contemporary issue, thinking of all the brave soldiers wounded in foreign fields.]

Archers in Australia?  The more perceptive may realise that BBC Radio Four’s ‘The Archers’ is not broadcast to Australia.  However, ex-pat enthusiasts may register for the podcasts and copy to their iPods.  Son can follow the latest events in Ambridge as he cycles to Sydney’s city centre along cycleways, past freeways, tower blocks and harbour views.  In that southern metropolis he, by contrast, remains engaged with the doings of David [‘bit of a prat’], Ruth [Aw nooo!] and Jill [nice granny, the most normal of the lot!] and the rest.

Photo copyright CSavag

Which reminds me – it’s been a long time since we heard Oliver’s mellifluous tones [Michael Cochrane].   Another nice chap:  let’s ensure those sadistic script editors don’t push him in the river or under a galloping horse.  We like our Archers men [possibly excepting predictable and boring old Joe Grundy].

So I am wondering in what other far-flung places listeners may have heard the fatal episode.  If you listen to ‘The Archers’ somewhere in Uttar Pradesh or Samarkand or Polynesia, or wherever – it might be interesting to know.

Posted in 'The Archers' | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Where were you when they killed Nigel Pargetter?

Suspension of disbelief – suspension of belief?

I was reminded of dear old Nigel only today [1st April and this not an April Fool] on hearing Graham Seed’s dulcet tones on Radio 4.  You may recall that Graham played the part of Nigel in BBC Radio 4’s ‘The Archers’ for many years until so untimely bumped him off at the New Year.

Where was I on that unforgettable occasion?  Read on because this may not be as boring as you imagine:  actually I was on the main road heading south out of Sydney, New South Wales.   Through Lewisham, Dulwich Hill and Banksia  the story was unravelling and we [son and self] scented a tragic climax.   By the time we reached Hurstville via Bexley we could hardly contain our agitation.  Would Nigel fall off the roof, or would David?   Would whoever it was survive?   Did we really care that much about the appalling Helen and her fatherless baby?  [Not really.]  But as regards dear Nigel, we struggled with disbelief at the unfolding of events and the misguided script editors behind it all.

When it became obvious that we were unlikely to reach the climax of the programme before we arrived at our destination, where a family reunion was to take place, the car slowed to a moderate pace as the tension increased.  We heard the final denouement with incredulity during a three-point turn outside our destination in the southern suburb of Hurstville .

Dum de dum de dum de dum…    [To be continued next time.]

Posted in 'The Archers' | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Victory?

Without wishing to tempt Fate, or the Furies, or whoever, it’s possible the gremlins in the website have taken a holiday.  If this posts successfully and in the right place, three cheers for the triumph of mind over technology!  Here goes…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Budget Day

What a beautiful sunny warm spring day for a Budget!   I’m not being too serious about this budget as the implications have yet to be analysed, and no doubt they will be dissected inside out by the pundits.  But the price of petrol is coming down tonight [hurrah, we were just going to fill up anyway] and the income threshold before you start to pay any income tax has gone up [hurrah] again.  Doubtless there’s bad news somewhere, but just for one happy daffodil-and-primrose moment let’s be cheerful.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Japan

With the news from Japan heavy upon us at this moment there is nothing that can be said today that is not going to seem irrelevant, facile or trite.  Let us simply think of and – depending on people’s individual beliefs – meditate, light a candle, pray for or simply focus on the suffering people of Japan and the truly appalling prospects they are faced with.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The nettle in the sentence

Last month we returned home after a few weeks away.  While catching up with the backlog of ‘normal’ life I paid little attention to the pot plants on the windowsill, except for a slurp of water every so often.  Then the other day I noticed that I had been harbouring a young green nettle on the kitchen windowsill.

The nettle in the flowerpot lurked there for weeks until it was spotted, and then it became glaringly obvious.  As you can see, the original plant was overwhelmed by the misplaced weed.  It can be much the same with words:  a rogue word or a misplaced comma may lurk unnoticed in a sentence for days, weeks or forever.  Like the nettle, the effect if it’s not weeded out may not turn out to be what you really want.  Misplaced commas, for example, can cause as much havoc in a sentence as nettles in a flowerbed.

The Nettle

"The Nettle" photo copyright CSavage

You may have noticed a type of word-nettle that’s popping up all the time in letters, like this one:  “As a teacher, I believe that you will be interested in our software for schools”.  The writer, who is marketing software, thinks he/she is addressing a teacher but actually claims to be a teacher, “As a teacher, I..”.   The qualifying phrase “As a teacher” is in the wrong place next to “I”;  if it snuggles up next to “you” the meaning becomes clear:  “I believe that you, as a teacher, will ..”.

Over the next few weeks we may unearth a few more word-nettles.  Meanwhile, if you are short of time and would like someone to check your verbal flowerpots, perhaps I could assist?

Posted in Language | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Daylight Robbery?

It seems the great British public is being robbed annually of that fundamental and free commodity: daylight.  How many have cottoned on to this?  We have never been consulted as far as I know [have we?] yet we accept the loss of hours of daylight.  How can this be?

In both northern and southern hemispheres the clocks are moved forward or back by one hour each spring and autumn.  Twice a year, everyone says “Don’t forget!” [and someone always does].  This is what happens in the UK:

Midsummer, the day with the most hours of light in the Northern Hemisphere, is June 22nd and mid-winter is half a year later on December 22nd.  Our clocks are adjusted by one hour somewhere between the two to allow us to make the most of all that lovely summer daylight [and to reduce the mid-winter gloom].  You might imagine the spring and autumn changes would occur at roughly the same distance from mid-summer, but you would be wrong.  In fact, we are short of Summer Time by six weeks.  Here’s how:

March 27th 2011, when the nation’s clocks will move forward one hour, is thirteen weeks after mid-winter and TWELVE weeks before midsummer.  October 31st, when the clocks go back, is seven and a half weeks before mid-winter and EIGHTEEN weeks after midsummer.   [This a long-established pattern.]   Eighteen minus twelve is six, six weeks = forty-two days.  Put another way, British Summer Time is six weeks shorter than it could be.

How can this be put right?

Photo copyright J&C Savage

On March 27th there will be more than thirteen and a half hours between sunrise and sunset, while on October 31st there will be a little over nine and a half hours, a difference of four hours.  If you look for a date in spring when the daylight hours are the same as October 31st you reach a point somewhere before mid-February.  [February 13th this enjoyed nine hours fifty minutes of daylight.]  Therefore the spring change needs to be made on a February weekend around six weeks before the present time.

Thank you for reading this complicated narrative.  I hope that you might be inspired to have a look at this for yourself and see if you come to the same conclusions.  With moves afoot to reintroduce “Double Summer Time” it could be a good moment to think about campaigning for ‘fair summertime’.

Posted in Summertime | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On World Book Night: Libraries!

Three Cheers, it’s World Book Night!  No cheers for the councils cutting libraries.  They may say it’s a question of “use or or lose it”, so are we book-lovers making good use of our local libraries? Parents may be reading … Continue reading

More Galleries | Tagged | 2 Comments

Let’s start with a joke

Wordplay has been a mainstay of the British sense of humour from Shakespeare onward. Double meanings lead to misunderstandings, chaos and hilarity.  The style has been adopted and adapted enthusiastically in the US.  This joke, which could have been invented either side of the Big Pond, reached me not long ago:

‘A man is out in the countryside enjoying a day’s shooting. He has a fair bag of innocent creatures when he comes across a man’s body in some woodland. Luckily he’s within mobile range, so he rings the Emergency Service. “I think he’s dead!” he says, in a bit of a panic. “Just keep calm,” says the operator, “Breathe slowly. If you think he’s dead just put the phone down a moment and and make sure.” There is silence, then a loud bang. “Right, now what do I do?”‘

That shows that you can’t be too careful about what you say, what you hear [or think you hear] and what you write!  The spoken word can be usually corrected without too much difficulty, unlike that joke, but the written word – from email to encyclopedia, from text to thesis – needs to be selected with great care.   Words are the cement that holds life together.  In this site we will be exploring this and other aspects of writing along the way.

Posted in Language | Leave a comment

Savage by name but not by nature..

I am developing my writing via the Professional Writing MA at University College Falmouth.   Writing online is a new challenge which I’m enjoying – maybe not surprising as I tend to be a compulsive communicator (and I’m a Gemini).

In the course of defining my specialist subjects, I will be exploring a variety of topics which may include:  travel, cats, dowsing and healing, home and family, food, council stuff, a recent trip to New Zealand, elections – and some fiction.  I’m quite good at writing letters.

I have been a councillor in local government for twenty years and was a parliamentary candidate in one General Election.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments